1Purpose

This document describes the rules that apply when roads, footpaths, cycle paths and other transport infrastructure are drawn and updated in Samgöngunet, the Icelandic Road Database (IRDB). The aim is for the network to be drawn the same way throughout the country, regardless of who does the drawing.

2Definitions

The following terms are used in this document. Icelandic terms are given for reference.

Samgöngunet IRDB
The Icelandic Road Database. It holds data on roads, footpaths and cycle paths, their features, and various structures in the transport network.
Road vegur
The carriageway together with its shoulders. See Figure 1.
Carriageway akbraut
The part of the road intended for vehicle traffic.
Lane akrein
One of the parallel strips into which a carriageway is divided lengthwise, either by road markings or because each strip is wide enough for a single line of vehicles.
Reference link viðmiðunarlína
A line representing a road, carriageway, footpath or cycle path in Samgöngunet, usually along its centreline. A reference link runs between two nodes.
Node nóða
A point in the network where reference links meet or end, for example at junctions, at the end of a road, or where the pedestrian and cycle network connects to the road network. Nodes define how the network is connected.
Topology grannfræði
Information on how reference links connect to each other through nodes, independent of their exact shape.
Geometry rúmfræði
The shape and position of a reference link in coordinates. The geometry also determines the length of the link.
Feature eiginleiki
Information recorded on a reference link or part of one, such as surface type, road number, street name or speed limit.
Road authority veghaldari
The body responsible for a road, its operation and maintenance, usually Vegagerðin or a municipality.

3Responsibility

Samgöngunet is a joint project of Náttúrufræðistofnun (the Natural Science Institute of Iceland) and Vegagerðin (the Icelandic Road and Coastal Administration). Náttúrufræðistofnun builds and operates the system, while Vegagerðin owns the project and is responsible for the correctness of the data.

Road authorities are responsible for reporting changes to their roads so that Samgöngunet can be updated.

4Generalization rules

The network in Samgöngunet is a simplified representation of the real road network. To make the network consistent across the country, common rules are needed for how it is drawn. These are called generalization rules and are described below as briefly as possible.

Swedish text in figures

The figures come from the generalization rules of the Swedish national road database (NVDB), and some of them contain Swedish text:

  • Rätt – correct
  • Fel – incorrect
  • Före / Efter – before / after
  • Statlig väg – state road
  • Kommunal väg – municipal road
  • Planskilt – grade-separated
  • över / under – over / under
  • Länk – reference link
  • Slitlager – surface
  • Grus / Belagd – gravel / paved

4.1General rules for road, pedestrian and cycle networks

Three basic rules apply to the whole network:

In addition:

4.2Road network

This section describes the rules that apply to the road network.

4.2.1Basic rule for drawing roads

The reference link should follow the centreline of the carriageway. A single carriageway gets one line. Where carriageways are separated, for example by a barrier or a median, one line is drawn for each direction of travel.

The line should be as straight as possible. Local widenings, such as parking bays, bus stops or overtaking lanes, should be ignored.

To know where the line should go, it is important to distinguish between lane, carriageway and road; see Figure 1 and the definitions.

Road cross-section numbered 1, 2 and 3
Figure 1. Terms: 1 = lane, 2 = carriageway, 3 = road.

The table shows where the reference link goes for the most common road types.

Road typePosition of the reference linkIllustration
Ordinary road or streetCentre of the carriageway, one line for the whole road.One reference link in the centre of the carriageway
Separated carriageways between two junctionsCentre of each carriageway, one line per direction.Two reference links
Carriageways separated over a stretch of 200 m or moreCentre of each carriageway, one line per direction.Two reference links on separated carriageways
2+1 road with a median barrierCentreline of the outer lane, one line per direction.2+1 road
2+2 road with a median barrierCentre of each carriageway, one line per direction.2+2 road
Multi-lane road, e.g. four lanesCentre of the carriageway. If the carriageways are separated by a barrier or median, one line per direction.Four-lane road
Motorway or expresswayCentre of the carriageway in each direction. The line does not always coincide with a painted lane line.Motorway

4.2.2Exceptions to the basic rule

In a few cases the basic rule is set aside so that the reference link does not swing back and forth between lanes.

1. Mixed 2+2 and 2+1 road. The road has two lanes in one direction throughout, and alternates between one and two lanes in the other. The line follows the left lane, which stays continuous along the whole stretch; see Figure 2.

Reference link on a mixed 2+2 and 2+1 road
Figure 2. Reference link on a road that mixes 2+2 and 2+1.

2. Long entry ramp. Where the right lane is a long entry ramp, the line continues along the left lane and does not veer into the right lane; see Figure 3 and Figure 4.

Incorrect reference link at a long entry ramp
Figure 3. Incorrect (“Fel”): the line veers onto the ramp.
Correct reference link at a long entry ramp
Figure 4. Correct (“Rätt”): the line stays in the left lane and the ramp joins it.

3. Ramp becomes a lane. At interchanges on 2+1 roads, an entry ramp often continues as a lane, so one lane becomes two. The reference link then moves out to the outer lane, as the basic rule requires; see Figure 5.

Entry ramp ends and there are two lanes
Figure 5. The entry ramp ends and the road has two lanes.

4. Car parks and open areas. In open areas with defined driving routes, such as large car parks, reference links may be drawn along the main routes; see Figure 6.

Road network in a shopping centre car park
Figure 6. Road network in a shopping centre car park.

4.2.3Continuity rule

Avoid switching back and forth between one and two reference links where carriageways are separated over short stretches. If a stretch is shorter than 200 metres, the representation in the network should not change, even if the separation is interrupted in reality, for example by a short gap in the barrier or at a junction.

When judging the length of a separation, only consider what separates the carriageways, such as a barrier, a median or painted separation. Roads joining the stretch do not interrupt it.

Example 1. Two separate reference links are drawn all the way between nodes A and B, because the gap in the barrier is shorter than 200 metres; see Figure 7.

Two reference links all the way between A and B
Figure 7. Two separate reference links all the way between A and B.

Example 2. If either stretch A–B or C–D is longer than 200 metres, two separate reference links are drawn all the way from A to D; see Figure 8.

Two reference links all the way from A to D
Figure 8. Two separate reference links all the way from A to D.

Example 3. Painted separation (such as a hatched area or a no-overtaking marking) can also lead to two separate links; see Figure 9.

Painted separation leads to separate carriageways
Figure 9. Painted separation can also lead to separate carriageways.
Bridges

The 200 metre rule does not apply to bridges. A bridge is always drawn as it is, regardless of its length. If the bridge has two carriageways with a barrier or other obstacle between them, two reference links are drawn. If it has one carriageway, one link is drawn; see Figure 10.

Bridge drawn as it is
Figure 10. A bridge is always drawn as it is, regardless of length. The continuity rule does not apply to bridges.
Example of the continuity rule

In Figure 11 the carriageways are separated by medians from the roundabout to the T-junction on the right. East of the T-junction, painted separation divides the traffic.

Example of the continuity rule
Figure 11. Example of the continuity rule.

To keep continuity, the reference links do not merge into one node until the painted separation ends, at the pedestrian crossing on the far right; see Figure 12.

Eastern part of the previous figure
Figure 12. Close-up of the eastern part of Figure 11. The links merge where the separation ends.

4.2.4Node placement

In the road network, nodes are placed only:

The length of a reference link between two nodes (measured in the horizontal plane) must be more than 5 metres. If a short link created at a junction would be shorter than 5 metres, the links are merged into a single node.

An exception applies where the road network connects to the pedestrian and cycle network. There, nodes may be as close as 2 metres, but never closer.

Nodes at junctions depending on distance
Figure 13. Left: the links are more than 5 m apart, so there are two nodes. Right: they are less than 5 m apart, so the junction gets one node.
Nodes at painted separation

Where carriageways are separated by painted separation (a hatched area), the node is placed where the separation begins or ends; see Figure 14.

Node where painted separation begins
Figure 14. The node is placed where the painted separation begins.
Where two links become one

Where two carriageways, drawn as two reference links, merge into one, the node is placed where the painted separation ends; see Figure 15.

Two reference links become one
Figure 15. The node is placed where the painted separation begins or ends.

4.2.5Start and end of reference links

A node is placed where a road begins or ends. This is usually obvious, but the examples below help in less clear-cut cases.

Road ending in a turning area

Where a road ends in a turning area or another large open area, the node is placed where the reference link meets the far edge of the drivable surface; see Figure 16.

Road ending in a turning area
Figure 16. Road ending in a turning area. The node is where the link meets the far edge of the drivable surface.
Road ending in a turning loop

Where a road ends in a turning loop with an island in the middle, the reference link should follow the loop as it actually is; see Figure 17.

Road ending in a turning loop
Figure 17. Road ending in a turning loop.

4.2.6Junctions and roundabouts

The basic rules in section 4.1 apply to all junctions and roundabouts. In addition, each case must be judged on its own merits. The rules below cover only the most common situations.

Order of priority when in doubt
  1. First, make sure all connections (possible movements) are represented.
  2. Then follow the dimensions for traffic islands and separation (section 4.2.6.12).

When a new road is added to a junction, the junction as a whole must be reassessed before deciding where the nodes should go.

4.2.6.1Simple T-junction

In a T-junction the node is placed where the reference links cross; see Figure 18.

Simple T-junction
Figure 18. Simple T-junction.
4.2.6.2T-junction with separated carriageways

If all roads at the junction have separated carriageways, the basic rule gives four nodes, provided that no link becomes shorter than 5 metres; see Figure 19.

T-junction where all roads have separated carriageways
Figure 19. All roads have separated carriageways: four nodes.

If only one road has separated carriageways, there is one node; see Figure 20.

One road with separated carriageways
Figure 20. One road with separated carriageways and two without: one node.

If two roads have separated carriageways, there are two nodes; see Figure 21.

Two roads with separated carriageways
Figure 21. Two roads with separated carriageways and one without: two nodes.
Avoid sharp angles

In junctions of this type, sharp angles should be avoided where possible. Figure 22 shows an incorrect solution where a sharp angle causes problems for routing from north to west.

Incorrectly drawn junction with a sharp angle
Figure 22. Incorrect (“Fel”): a sharp angle in the junction.
4.2.6.3T-junction with a loop

Where a road connects to a loop, it is always drawn with two separate reference links: one for the loop and one for the road leading to it. A node is placed where they meet; see Figure 23.

T-junction with a loop
Figure 23. T-junction with a loop.
4.2.6.4Skewed T-junction

The reference links should reflect how the junction is built. The basic rule also applies to skewed T-junctions, with the node placed where the links cross; see Figure 24.

Skewed T-junction
Figure 24. Skewed T-junction.

In most cases, however, the road connects at a right angle, and the node is then placed as shown in Figure 25.

Skewed T-junction with a right-angled connection
Figure 25. Skewed T-junction with a right-angled connection.
4.2.6.5Simple crossroads

At a crossroads the node is placed where the reference links cross; see Figure 26.

Simple crossroads
Figure 26. Simple crossroads.

If all roads have separated carriageways there are four nodes, one at each crossing point, provided that no link becomes shorter than 5 metres; see Figure 27.

All roads with separated carriageways
Figure 27. All roads have separated carriageways: four nodes.

If three roads have separated carriageways and one does not, there are three nodes; see Figure 28.

Three roads with separated carriageways and one without
Figure 28. Three roads with separated carriageways and one without: three nodes.

If two roads have separated carriageways there are two nodes. Figure 29 shows a case where the two roads are adjacent; sharp angles can be hard to avoid here. Figure 30 shows a case where they are opposite each other.

Two adjacent roads with separated carriageways
Figure 29. Two adjacent roads with separated carriageways and two without.
Two opposite roads with separated carriageways
Figure 30. Two opposite roads with separated carriageways and two without.
4.2.6.6Skewed crossroads

At a skewed crossroads the node is placed where the reference links cross; see Figure 31.

Skewed crossroads
Figure 31. Skewed crossroads.
4.2.6.7Staggered crossroads

A staggered crossroads gets two nodes if the crossing points are more than 5 metres apart; see Figure 32. If they are less than 5 metres apart, it gets one node; see Figure 33.

Staggered crossroads with two nodes
Figure 32. More than 5 m apart: two nodes.
Staggered crossroads with one node
Figure 33. Less than 5 m apart: one node.
4.2.6.8New road joining an existing junction

When a new road is added to a junction, the junction as a whole must be reassessed before deciding where the nodes should go.

In Figure 34 a new road has been connected to an existing junction. The middle drawing shows an incorrect solution, where the new road was simply attached without reassessing the junction. The drawing on the far right shows the correct solution.

Original junction, incorrect and correct connection of a new road
Figure 34. Original junction (left), incorrectly connected new road (middle) and correctly connected new road (right).
4.2.6.9Roundabouts

Roundabouts are drawn as designed, usually as a circle. Nodes are placed where the reference links of the approach roads meet the roundabout's link; see Figure 35.

Small roundabouts that are fully drivable, have no traffic islands, and where nodes cannot be at least 5 metres apart are always drawn as a single node. If there are traffic islands at the roundabout, the rules in section 4.2.6.12 apply.

Roundabout
Figure 35. Roundabout. All nodes are at least 5 m apart.
4.2.6.10Junctions with a teardrop island

At junctions with a teardrop-shaped island, the node is placed where the hatched area or median begins or ends; see Figure 36 and Figure 37.

Junction with a teardrop island
Figure 36. Node at a teardrop island.
Example of a teardrop island
Figure 37. Example of a teardrop island in the road network.

If there is a barrier or other physical obstacle between the carriageways, the links do not merge into one node at the end of the teardrop, but continue as two links according to the basic rule; see Figure 38 and Figure 39.

Teardrop island with a physical obstacle
Figure 38. Teardrop island with a physical obstacle between the carriageways.
Example of a teardrop island with a physical obstacle
Figure 39. Example of a teardrop island with a physical obstacle between the carriageways.
4.2.6.11On- and off-ramps

On- and off-ramps should connect to the main road immediately where the hatched area (or median) ends.

Preferably, the ramp connects as a natural continuation of its alignment, without crossing a median or hatched area; see Figure 40 and Figure 41.

On-ramp
Figure 40. On-ramp.
Off-ramp
Figure 41. Off-ramp.

If that is not possible, the ramp is connected to the main road at an angle of about 45°, without crossing a median or hatched area; see Figure 42 and Figure 43.

On-ramp connected at 45°
Figure 42. On-ramp connected at about 45°.
Off-ramp connected at 45°
Figure 43. Off-ramp connected at about 45°.

A weaving section, where an on-ramp immediately becomes an off-ramp, does not get its own reference link but follows the basic rule. If nodes would be less than 5 metres apart, a single node is used; see Figure 44.

Weaving section
Figure 44. Weaving section: an on-ramp becomes an off-ramp.
4.2.6.12Traffic islands and hatched areas at junctions

Medians and hatched areas can cause one reference link to split into two. The following rules apply:

1. Medians separating opposing traffic. For the link to split, the longer side of the island must be at least 25 metres and the shorter side at least 10 metres. As a rule, only permanent physical obstacles, such as raised islands and barriers, are taken into account. A painted hatched area can also cause a split if information needs to be linked to a specific movement, or to describe how the network works at that location. A hatched area that measures at least 25 × 10 metres and is also marked with permanent physical features, such as road signs or bollards, is always drawn with separate links.

Median meeting 25 × 10 m
Figure 45. The longer side is over 25 m and the shorter side over 10 m: the link splits.
Median that is too narrow
Figure 46. The longer side is over 25 m but the shorter side under 10 m: the link does not split.

2. Islands separating traffic in the same direction (directional islands) always lead to separate links; see Figure 47–Figure 50.

Directional islands to the left
Figure 47. A directional island separates same-direction traffic on the left. The central median is too narrow to split the link.
Directional islands to the right
Figure 48. A directional island separates same-direction traffic on the right. The central median is too narrow to split the link.
Directional islands on both sides
Figure 49. Directional islands split the link on both the right and the left. The central median is too narrow to split the link.
All islands meet the requirements
Figure 50. All islands at the junction meet the requirements for separate links.

3. Painted directional islands. So that traffic rules and other information can be linked to the correct movement, painted hatched areas separating traffic in the same direction also lead to separate links; see Figure 51.

Painted directional island with a Give Way rule
Figure 51. Painted directional island. A Give Way rule applies to the right turn, so it gets its own link.

Figure 52 shows a roundabout with several different types of island.

Roundabout with different islands
Figure 52. Roundabout with different types of traffic island.
4.2.6.13Complex junctions

Topology takes precedence over geometry. A simple representation with correct connections is preferred over exact geometry. This is especially important where roads with separated carriageways meet. To achieve a simple and correct representation, without unnecessary nodes and links, requirements on shape, and sometimes even positional accuracy, often have to be relaxed within the junction. Otherwise the network risks being drawn differently depending on who draws it.

In complex junctions many reference links often meet. The first priority is then to make sure all connections are correct and all possible movements are represented. A good workflow is:

  1. Identify all medians and hatched areas that may lead to separate links.
  2. Draw the reference links that the separations require and extend them into the junction.
  3. Connect the links in the junction so that the topology is correct and it is possible to drive through.
  4. “Test drive” every movement and avoid angles smaller than 90° as far as possible.
Very complex junction
Figure 53. Example of a complex junction.

Where it is possible to turn around between separated carriageways, i.e. where the median is not closed off by a barrier or other obstacle, a cross-link between the carriageways should always be added; see Figure 54.

Two types of turning point
Figure 54. Two types of turning point where a cross-link should be added.

The cross-link should follow the actual vehicle movement at the site. Figure 55 shows an example where obstacles close off part of the area between the carriageways.

Turning point where obstacles close off part of the area
Figure 55. Turning point where the cross-link must follow the vehicle movement.

4.2.8Ferry routes

A ferry route is drawn as a line between the ferry terminals and should follow the ferry's likely course; see Figure 56.

Ferry route between terminals
Figure 56. Ferry route drawn as a line between ferry terminals.

Ferry routes to other countries are drawn the same way, but end in a node at sea, at the territorial boundary in the direction of the destination; see Figure 57.

Ferry route to the territorial boundary
Figure 57. A ferry route to another country ends in a node at the territorial boundary.

4.3Pedestrian and cycle network

This section describes the rules for the pedestrian and cycle network, i.e. footways, footpaths, cycle paths and cycle lanes.

4.3.1Basic rule

The reference link should follow the centreline of the cycle path, footway or cycle lane; see Figure 58.

Reference link along the centre of a path
Figure 58. The reference link follows the centreline of the path.

The figures below show typical cases and whether a pedestrian link, a cycle link, or both should be drawn. Traffic signs along the path (Figure 61) indicate what kind of path it is.

Typical cases 1–3
Figure 59. Typical cases 1–3.
Typical cases 4–6
Figure 60. Typical cases 4–6.
#SituationWhat is drawn
1Road with no dedicated space for pedestrians and cyclistsNo link in the pedestrian and cycle network.
2Road with a footwayA pedestrian link, one on each side if there are footways on both sides.
3Road with a shared footpath and cycle pathA cycle link, one on each side if there are paths on both sides.
4Footpath and cycle path divided into pedestrian and cycle parts by markings or similarOne cycle link.
5Footway, plus a cycle lane painted on the carriagewayBoth a pedestrian link and a cycle link.
6Footway and cycle path separated by a permanent physical dividerBoth a pedestrian link and a cycle link. Traffic islands alone do not split the pedestrian and cycle network.
Traffic signs for pedestrian and cycle routes
Figure 61. Traffic signs for pedestrians and cyclists that can help identify the type of path (Swedish signs and text).

Figure 62 shows real examples of cases 4 and 5, and Figure 63 shows an example of case 6, where the path is split into two links because of a physical divider.

Examples of cases 4 and 5
Figure 62. Examples of cases 4 and 5.
Footpath and cycle path separated by a physical divider
Figure 63. Footpath and cycle path separated by a physical divider and therefore drawn as two links (case 6).

The link should be as straight as possible, and local widenings of paths should be ignored. Where pedestrian and cycle routes share the same area but clearly differ in construction, colour or material, they are drawn as separate links.

In open areas such as squares, car parks and shared spaces, one or more links are drawn along the main routes across the area. Where links cross, they are connected with a node; see Figure 64.

Pedestrian and cycle network on a square
Figure 64. Pedestrian and cycle network in an open area, such as a square.

Footway and cycle path links must not wander back and forth across the road link, for example because one line is less accurate than the other. The pedestrian and cycle network must always be on the correct side of the road link, and where the networks run in parallel, the distance between them should be in reasonable proportion to the width of the road.

A vertical route, such as a lift, cannot be drawn in Samgöngunet. The link is therefore given a slight slope, so that its lower and upper ends are about 1 metre apart in the horizontal plane.

A pedestrian crossing and a cycle crossing that run side by side across a street share one reference link; see Figure 65.

Shared link for a pedestrian crossing and cycle crossing
Figure 65. Shared reference link where a pedestrian crossing and a cycle crossing run together across a street.

In complex junctions, simple connections may need to take priority over exact position and shape. To keep the number of nodes in the junction to a minimum, the link may therefore deviate slightly from the actual position of the path.

4.3.2Continuity rule

The pedestrian and cycle network aims for continuous links. If a cycle path or footway is interrupted temporarily, for example at a junction, a bus stop or a driveway, the link is still drawn through the junction, past the bus stop or across the driveway. The same applies to footways: the pedestrian route continues across a junction even where there is no marked crossing; see Figure 66.

Cycle path continues through a junction
Figure 66. The footway and cycle path continue through the junction even though the markings are interrupted.

The link is drawn as continuous if the path reappears within:

Cycle path continues across a driveway
Figure 67. The cycle path continues across the driveway even though the markings are interrupted. The same applies to footways.

4.3.3Node placement

As in the road network, nodes in the pedestrian and cycle network are placed only:

The difference is that nodes may be as close as 2 metres apart (in the horizontal plane). At lifts, 1 metre is acceptable. This may mean that links sometimes have to be merged into a single node. In the road network the minimum is 5 metres.

Connections when the nearest node is more than 2 m away
Figure 68. The nearest node is more than 2 m away, so the connection gets its own node.

Figure 68 shows:

  1. How a cycle path connects to the road network when the right-angled connection is more than 2 metres from the nearest road node. If the connection would be within 2 metres of an existing node, it is made to that node instead (Figure 69).
  2. How a pedestrian crossing with an adjacent cycle crossing connects to footways and the road network with nodes.
  3. That nodes are placed where the pedestrian, cycle and road networks cross at grade.
Connections when the nearest node is less than 2 m away
Figure 69. The nearest node is less than 2 m away, so the connection is made to the existing node.

4.3.4Connecting the pedestrian and cycle network to the road network

This section describes how the pedestrian and cycle network should connect to the road network. The networks should also be connected where people are likely to continue their journey along the road, even if the path does not actually connect to the road but runs alongside it; see Figure 70.

Footpath or cycle path with its own link connected to a road
Figure 70. A footpath or cycle path is drawn with its own reference link. The angle where it meets the road link must not be less than 45°.
Cycle lane connected to the road at a right angle
Figure 71. A cycle path becomes a cycle lane along the road and connects to the road at a right angle where it ends.
Cycle path connected to a turning area
Figure 72. A cycle path connected to a turning area. It is possible to cycle through, but not to drive.

The pedestrian and cycle network should always connect to the road network at turning areas. If the connection would be shorter than 2 metres, the networks are merged into a single node. This can be done in three ways:

  1. The pedestrian and cycle network is connected to the existing node at the end of the road.
  2. The road is extended to the pedestrian and cycle network.
  3. The road is adjusted so that the node lies halfway between the end of the turning area and the centreline of the path.

4.3.5Connecting address points to the network

From every address point there should be clear, unobstructed access at a right angle to some part of the network, at a distance of no more than 5 metres. If the network is further away, the address gets its own reference link from the path to the door; see Figure 73.

Pedestrian and cycle network in a residential area with numbered addresses
Figure 73. Address points in a residential area and how they connect to the footpath.

4.3.6Connections between the pedestrian, cycle and road networks

If the road, pedestrian and cycle networks are not connected, routing can become very confusing for pedestrians and cyclists, who may be sent on detours of several kilometres just to cross the street.

The networks should therefore be connected where appropriate. A node must always be placed where pedestrian, cycle and road links cross at grade, so that pedestrians and cyclists can reach the road network. If a particular mode of travel is not allowed through a connection, this is indicated with the appropriate features.

The pedestrian and cycle network should also be connected to the road network where people may want to continue along the road, even if the path does not actually connect to the road but runs alongside it. Otherwise routing for pedestrians and cyclists becomes unrealistic.

When drawing the pedestrian and cycle network, it is sometimes necessary to also draw roads that would not otherwise be part of the road network, so that the pedestrian and cycle network can be used for routing. These are mostly small private roads and car parks. For example, a car park may need to be drawn so that a path connects to the street. A routing system can only follow registered reference links and make decisions at nodes. It does not know about connections that exist in reality if they are missing from the database; see Figure 74.

Roads that need to be drawn
Figure 74. Roads that need to be drawn to connect the pedestrian and cycle network to the road network.

Roads in car parks are part of the road network and must be present to connect the pedestrian and cycle network to the rest of the network; see Figure 75.

Connection through a car park
Figure 75. The pedestrian and cycle network connected to the road network through a car park.

4.3.7Roads with advisory cycle shoulders (2-minus-1 roads)

Sweden has a road design called bygdeväg or bymiljöväg (in English, a 2-minus-1 road). It has a single central lane for traffic in both directions and wide shoulders, marked with broken edge lines, for pedestrians and cyclists. Vehicles may drive onto the shoulders when meeting. The design varies; see Figure 76.

Road with advisory cycle shoulders
Figure 76. Road with advisory cycle shoulders (Swedish bygdeväg).

No link is drawn in the pedestrian and cycle network on such roads. Because vehicles may drive onto the shoulders, they do not count as a footpath, cycle path or cycle lane.

4.4Extent of features

A feature that covers a whole section must always be recorded from node to node. It should reach all the way to the node so that no gaps are created. In Figure 77 the surface “gravel” should reach all the way to the node at the paved road.

Feature extent at a junction
Figure 77. The surface extends all the way to the node at the junction (“Grus” = gravel, “Belagd” = paved).